Are they that pathetically dishonest or just ignorant?

It's the 'mainstream media's fault'

"[Candy] Crowley earns extra demerits for taking the media’s penchant for faulty fact-checking to new heights when she jumped into the October 16 town hall-style debate to validate President Obama’s claim that he called the attack in Benghazi, Libya, “an act of terror” the very next morning. Crowley endorsed Obama’s story, telling Romney: “He did, in fact, sir, call it an act of terror.”

Not according to the transcript, which had Obama only speaking generically about how “no acts of terror will ever shake the resolve of this nation,” not assigning that label to the violence in Benghazi.

I'm not sure what's more pathetic; the wingnuts whining about losing, or their wimpering lies about why.

'According to the transcipt', Barack Obama DID call the attack in Benghazi 'an act of terror' that 'very next morning', and any fool can easily look that up. As for Obama 'speaking generically', he was holding a special news conference in the Rose Garden about the attack in Benghazi. What, do you dumbasses think Obama was referring to Northern Ireland or Columbia when he said "act of terror"?

Nobody's that fucking stupid. But, they are liars.

Remarks by the President on the Deaths of U.S. Embassy Staff in Libya