WASHINGTON—The night before Susan Rice went public with the administration's assessment that the Sept. 11 U.S. consulate attack in Libya grew out of a spontaneous demonstration against an anti-Muslim video, intelligence analysts were receiving new information that contradicted the account she gave. ...Despite their growing uncertainty, intelligence officials didn’t feel they had enough conclusive, new information to revise their assessment. Ms. Rice wasn’t warned of their new doubts before she went on the air the next morning...She reported what had been reported to her at the time. And that's from Rupert.
And let me ask you a question. If some of the 'terrorists' at Benghazi were there because of the video, weren't they committing 'an act of terror' like Barack Obama called it the very next day? Teabaggers don't think so.
Teabaggers and their lying sheepherders in the rightwing media ignorantly argue that if the Obama administration reports it could have been because of the video they're denying it was, 'an act of terror'. Of course, anyone with a shred of intergrity would know that's a lie, since that fact is on video.
And also, being a reader of 'done that' YOU know Obama did NOT say that it was absolute that it came from the video and that he stated within a mere 14 hours of that attack that his "suspicions" told him,
"there are folks involved in this who were looking to target Americans from the start."
Damn, 14 hours? That was days before 'the intelligence' knew.
